Variable truth. Uncertain politics. Discordant economy. How can the Sky remain the limit?

Archive for December, 2008

Winter Break – Possibly Unrelated Coincidences and Somewhat Abstract Thoughts Thereon

In Philosophy, Random Thoughts, Religion/Spirituality on December 28, 2008 at 10:14 pm

3:29 AM. I’m bored. I didn’t think I’d be this bored over Winter Break, when people are usually supposed to be having fun, etc. It’s weird—I’ve done all the usual things one does after school gets out, but I’m still sort of bored. Whatever. It’s comforting to know that I’ll be going back to school soon. I wanted to talk about something weird that happened to me tonight, though. I was driving with my father tonight to take a coat back to A&F. When we left my house, I threw something over some of the things he had in his backseat, which aggravated him. He started telling me that he didn’t want me to throw my things over his, etc., etc. He then said, and I quote,

“Now, if someone messed with your stuff, you’d throw a fit too.”

Whatever. We went to A&F and I found out that the coat I wanted in Large was sold out. Fine, we left. Much later, after we got home, I went to finalize the iPod deal I’d won on eBay, only to find that, suffice it to say—despite the contrary this morning—I no longer had the funds to do so. Naturally, I flipped. And then I thought about what my father said.

Let me get a bit personal. I’m just as religious as the next guy, alright? I hold a basic belief that there does exist a force of some kind that holds a good deal of influence over a lot that goes on everywhere. However, I’m very rational, and I can usually find explanations for most of my experiences. Yet, for some reason, I found this to be a very interesting coincidence. Bible Chapter Exodus, 20:12 states:

“Honor your father and your mother so that you may live long in the land the Lord your God is giving you.”

I presume that many of you raised Christian in one capacity or another throughout your life has experienced that little pang of guilt that comes from, you know, displeasing your parents or unintentionally (or maybe intentionally, lol) insulting them in one way or another. Now, at the time, I didn’t feel guilty about throwing my stuff over my father’s things in his car—and trying to tell him afterwards why his aggravation was unwarranted—but after I saw this discrepancy, and remembered his words, I felt a bit creeped out. I wonder: does the Golden Rule (or, the Boomerang Effect) in Matthew (Do unto others as you would have others do unto you) truly apply to life? My question, of course, stems from a supposition that people usually interpret that quote as encouraging of good deeds and general goodness in life. Yet, I think that, while general definitions of good and bad seldom differ, individual and personal definitions of good and bad almost always do. My father’s definition of courtesy—something coming from a notion of good behavior towards others—given his behavior, can very well said to have induced him to react as he did. While this inevitably implies that his definition of courtesy might differ from those of many others’, it still holds true that his personal definition of courtesy likely influenced his reaction. I wonder, though, if the “Rule” applies to individual definitions of good, rather than general perceptions of good and bad. James 4:4 reads,

“Whoever shall be a friend of the world is an enemy of God.”

This implies that biblical doctrine disfavors the adoption of general, that is, popular, opinions and views on morality and life. This, then, might also suggest that popular perceptions of good and bad are, according to said doctrine, incorrect. Though the Bible does indeed say that God loves all people equally, I’m inclined to think that God would favor religious people more in his consideration of those going to heaven, hell or in-between—as, since man, according to the bible, was constructed in God’s “image”, it follows that our perceptions must be similar, however little, to His; and, since I, as a human, think this way, it follows that said perception is similar to that experienced by God. And, to anyone thinking this, I’m not saying I’m God, lol. I’m not self-absorbed or anything like that. But, really, would God favor very religious people more than less religious people? And, moreover, if said religious people were offended by someone violating their personal rules of courtesy, would the Golden Rule come into effect? Would said violation spark the activation of some karmic principle inducing reciprocal action on the violator? I don’t know. Honestly, I really never think much about religion unless I have no other way to explain something, but my dad’s statement rang true tonight. In a religious context, I wonder if the Boomerang effect applies in relation to personal definitions of good and bad rather than universal ones. In that respect, could anything that insults or negatively affects anyone have reciprocal karmic effects on the human source of said insult or negative effect? Something for spiritual readers to think about.

The Insomniac Term Paper Chronicles, Part 1

In Politics, School on December 8, 2008 at 6:01 am

Good morning, everyone. This is Hadid again, procrastinating like I haven’t done in a year and a half and thus avoiding writing my 10-page Comparative Politics paper. Basically, I have to try to explain the end of the Cold War in a post-behavioralist context.  For those of you who don’t know what post-behavioralism is, it’s a theory of international relations that researches and attempts to constructively develop values, and calls for the politicization of the field itself. It’s derived from behavioralism, in that the latter masquerades as liberal while concealing its true ideology of empirical conservatism, detaches itself from reality in its conservative view on international relations, and conducts research so sophisticated as to actually hinder understanding thereof by laypeople.

In other words,

behavioralism =

john-mccain

with

dick-cheney

on the inside.

Yeah.

So, anyway, that Cold War. I really don’t know why it ended. Gorbachev, with his sweeping reforms of perestroika (economic and political restructuring), on the one hand, shocked the entire region into economic and bureaucratic destabilization; on the other, with glasnost, destroyed the political capital of the entire Communist party. Seems that when an incredibly corrupt, secretive and criminal government lets loose its secrets to its terrified, hungry and angry citizens, things tend to go wrong. Complete undermining of the Communist Party’s power, increasing governmental delegitimization and ultimate dissolution of the entire USSR, to name a few. All painful and very, very expensive—for the Soviets, anyway. They lost everything.

Could the Cold War happen again? True, Russia and the former Soviet republics still aren’t in as high economic straits as the US currently is (but that’s not saying much nowadays), but with Bush publicizing plans for a missile defense system to be placed in Europe and Medvedev threatening to fire short-range missiles at—no, I’m sorry, near Poland—and with Russian paranoia already escalating in reaction, could history possibly repeat itself? Top five causes factoring into the Cold War’s development: security-related paranoia, tension, hostility, postwar environment, and lack of honest diplomacy (arguably detrimental if used, yes, but with the Cold War, you never really know). Let’s see—pre-emptive war (“If you’re not with us, you’re against us.” Guess who said that? I’ll give you a hint, he can’t talk with or without a teleprompter), Russian officials perpetually intense distrust in US defense and overall security claims, sustainedly negative US-Russian relations since the alleged end of the Cold War in ≈1991—if you believe your professors, all you PoliSci majors out there; if you don’t, you could say it’s still going on, just with Russia trapped in the 90s and the US trying to understand why—Obama’s attempts to pull troops out of Iraq, and Bush’s total refusal to “negotiate with terrorists.” Hopefully I’m wrong. I’m just a PoliScier, trying to make some sense out of the world. It’s not like I’m reading about this stuff in painstaking detail or anything.

Oh, wait.

Tuition Worries During Pre-Finals Week. (WTF? I’m not even taking any Economics classes)

In Economics, School on December 5, 2008 at 4:56 am

God, I haven’t edited this blog in eons. 

_______________

Well, pre-finals week is upon us. Right now I’m up doing one out of my six (yes, 6) papers, four of which are due next week—one of which is supposed to be ten pages long, and which I HAVEN’T EVEN STARTED YET. Though, I must admit, ten-page papers are easier than people think. All you have to do is do five single-spaced pages, and then double-space them. Sigh. I guess it’s a psychological thing. ¯\(O_o)/¯

Speaking of school, the nearing prospect of paying off my student loans are increasingly encouraging me to take up alcoholism (kidding, kidding). At my university, tuition’s been going up by 3% per semester even since before I started attending. Yes, we’re a private school, and, yes, since we’re not funded by the state, we’re supposedly tuition-funded (tell that to all of the names of the donors immortalized in our  sidewalks’ bricks), but, seriously? Seeing as how food prices have increased by 8% since my freshman year (last year), and as how I’ve only seen two new programs emerge since then, I don’t really know where it’s all going. Let’s do some math here. If every student paid, for purposes of accuracy, about $40,000.00 per year, during the year of my entry (2007) , and there existed a total student body of ≈4,000 individuals at that time (not including graduate students), the total undergraduate student tuition paid at the end of last year comes out to $160,000,000.00. If increased by 6% by the end of this year (likely, given the economy’s state)—factoring in the number of students leaving per semester for various reasons (for our purposes, let’s say 30 per semester) this total will increase to ≈$262.666.666.67 aggregate tuition paid by the student body at the end of this school year.

For the record, this isn’t that much. Harvard’s endowment (34 billion) just dropped by 22% (8 million), leaving it with only, roughly, six (6) billion dollars—78% of its endowment—left to use for 35% of its operating budget. Their tuition is about $46,000.00, and they’re cutting spending and programs. Ouch. The NBER said that the current “recession” started in 2007. Ouch again. In a world where Harvard University, the wealthiest university on Earth, has to cut spending and programs, where does the steadily increasing tuition of a school with an annual tuition of about $40,000 go? Development? Probably not. Self-sustainment? Necessarily.

Always thinking,

Hadid